- COB LED Heat Sink
- SMD LED Heat Sink
- Lighting Housing
- Commercial LCD Display
distorted data? feds close 600 weather stations amid criticism they\'re situated to report warming
It seems to indicate that the Earth is warming, but some critics say it is government books that are getting familiar ---
Temperature readings due to sultry parking lots, airports and other places distort the true state of the climate.
In fact, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has closed about 600 of the nearly 9,000 weather stations in the past two years, believing that there is a problem or no need for these weather stations, after a long campaign by a critic, the issue of using unreliable data was highlighted.
The agency said the closure would help improve the collection of weather data, but critics such as meteorologists and blogger Anthony Watt said the closure was too little and too late.
\"The question remains, why do they continue to use the contaminated well mixture
Location and difference-
Watts told Fox News. com.
Watt has been looking for defective weather stations for years.
He pointed to a still man.
The open air station in Yosemite Park is an example of an object with a \"radiator\"-an object that stores heat and then releases it at night.
Radiators may cause useless data to be sent out at stations located inside or near them--
Usually in the form of an expansion temperature that does not represent a wider area.
\"The radiator is a road, a building, and metal pipes and beams are piled up around the station,\" he said . \".
After Yosemite increased the radiator, the temperature reading showed a strange trend: the minimum temperature at night increased more than the daytime temperature.
Watt said that this is because the concrete structure stores the heat released at night, and this trend supports the idea that the \"radiator\" is having an impact.
But the government agency that compiled the temperature data said the concern was unfounded because of the statistical methods used to adjust the data.
\"There is no doubt that the temperature record of NOAA is scientifically reliable,\" NOAA spokesman Scott Smullen told FoxNews . \". com.
\"To ensure the accuracy of records, scientists use peers
Various methods were reviewed to explain all potential inaccuracies in temperature readings, such as changes in station locations, instruments and replacements, and urban thermal effects.
Smullen added that the nearest station closure was in the \"extensive 6-
The forecast office of all national meteorological bureaus reviews once a month, \"to make the system better.
He said the agency considered several factors in the template station, including whether their data was redundant, whether urban growth caused the data to be invalid, and whether the site transmitted reliable data.
But Watt says the closure is an affirmation for the next few years.
Identify long term projects for stations with problems.
Some of the earlier official notices of the \"climate\" where the results of Watts were leaked
On 2009, the director of the NOAA National Climate Data Center appeared to take watts\'s findings seriously.
\"He has 40 sites for USHCN [weather]
Less ideal radio stations are exposed.
He claims that he can show urban bias and exposure bias.
We are writing a reply for our public affairs.
Director Thomas Carr wrote in an internal email: \"Not sure how it will develop . \".
Then the Government Accountability Office. -
Government agencies that publish reports from other agencies--
Did not properly study the problem
Two interviews with Watt\'s radio station.
In the August 2011 report entitled \"NOAA can improve the management of the United States\"S.
GAO concluded, \"NOAA has not yet developed a global policy . . . . . . Whether stations that do not meet the site selection criteria should remain open . . . . . . Or should be moved or turned off.
NOAA spokesman Scott smalun said that NOAA\'s review and closure of radio stations in the last two years was much broader than Watts\'s investigation.
\"While some of the 600 sites we target to close may overlap with some
Watts raised the question, and we know that his study only considered the 1,200 site selection criteria.
When we look back at the entire network, we have a subset of the sites of the entire network, and the site selection criteria are only one factor we consider.
\"So, how serious is the bad problem?
The location of the entire historical climate record?
Does it have an impact on the extent of man-made global warming?
If you look at the original station only, the temperature will rise by 1, Watts said.
1 F from 1979 to 2008.
This is much lower than the government estimates.
7 degrees Fahrenheit, which includes readings from all stations, including those with potential problems, tries to adjust according to the statistics.
But many scientists who are concerned about global warming say that statistical adjustments are effective, noting that many other temperature measurements are very consistent with the historical data of NOAA.
The \"Watt\" analysis is a outliers . . . . . . Several groups analyzed using global land temperature, ocean temperature and satellite temperature --Inferred temperature (
No thermometer! )
The rate of climate warming is very similar.
Information of the National Bureau of Oceans and Atmosphere]
Scott Mandia, Professor of Physics Science at Suffolk State University, said.
Watts said he had no objection to satellite data.
\"I have no objection to satellite measurement, but they are measuring the temperature of the atmosphere over the Earth, including all the cities, densely populated areas, and open space in the countryside . . . . . . My premise is: if you want to see the impact of carbon dioxide on climate warming, you need to look for real signals in areas that are not affected by urbanization.
In other words, Watts said the data show that global warming is more due to increased urbanization than greenhouse gases.
This finding is related to whether the government should further limit greenhouse gases.
Watts said: \"Then you should ask something about . . . . . . All the decisions on the food chain . \".